Why Rachel Notley's crude-by-rail plan is risky and possibly unnecessary - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 11:02 AM | Calgary | -10.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
BusinessAnalysis

Why Rachel Notley's crude-by-rail plan is risky and possibly unnecessary

The Alberta government has once again intervened in the energy sector, signing contracts to spend $3.7 billion to ship more oil out of the province by rail, but industry experts say the plan is risky.

'What the government has basically done is bolster CN and CP's oil-by-rail profits,' says industry analyst

Alberta Premier Rachel Notley's plan to spend $3.7 billion to transport oil out of the province by rail is a gamble, industry experts say. (CBC)

The Alberta government has once again intervened in the energy sector, signingcontracts to spend $3.7 billion to ship more oil out of the province by rail, but industry experts say the plan is risky.

The province announced Tuesday ithas signed contracts with CN Railand CP Rail to lease 4,400 rail cars to move oil across North America and tointernational markets.

Consider it an expensive insurance policy against a repeat of last year's oil price woes.

In 2018, demand for crude-by-rail surged and the private sector didn't have the capacity to boost shipments fast enough. As a result, there was a backlog of oilin the province and prices plunged,costing the industry and the government a hefty amount of potential revenue.

Premier RachelNotleywants to prevent that from happening again.

Hundreds of oil tank cars wait to be loaded at a terminal near the border between Alberta and Saskatchewan. (Dave Rae/CBC)

What's different now is that by the time the majority of the government's rail cars arrive in 2020, Alberta should have more pipeline capacity to export oil, and the private sector will likely also continue to ramp up its ability to move oil by rail.

That's why industry experts say the government's commitment to spend billions of dollars on crude by rail is a gamble. In fact, it may prove to be an unnecessary investment and put a significant amount of taxpayer money at risk.

"There's no reason why private sector companies couldn't have done this on their own and, in fact, they have been doing it on their own," said Robert Cooper, with the institutional sales and trading team at Calgary-based investment firm Acumen CapitalPartners.

Publicly tradedCenovusand Imperial Oil havealsoinvested heavilyin expanding crude-by-rail export capacity out of Alberta.

So it's the rail companies that stand to benefit most, Cooper says. "What the government has basically done is bolster CN and CP's oil-by-rail profits for the next three years."

Full capacity by mid-2020

Under the government's plan, the first shipmentsare expected to start in July and get up to fullcapacity by mid-2020. Provincial officials say the program will cost an estimated $3.7 billion over three years and generate aprofit of $2.2 billion in increased royalties and tax revenue. But if the industry's current investments pan out, there will be no need for the province's plan, and it could fall short of the expected profit.

Building new export pipelines has proven to be difficult for industry. However, theoilpatchhas reason to believe there will be more pipeline space soon.

By the time the bulk of the rail cars arrive in Alberta, Enbridge's Line 3 pipeline replacement project is scheduled to begin operating and add 370,000 barrels of export capacity.

Canada set several records in 2018 for shipping oil by train. (Dave Rae/CBC)

Enbridge is also looking at several other ways of building more export pipeline space in the next few years.

The company wants to create about 200,000 barrels per day by using drag-reducing agents in its pipeline. Upgrades to pumping stations could add another 125,000 barrels per day of capacity.

Enbridgemay also convert its Southern Lights pipeline, which currently imports diluent,to export oil. That would produce 150,000 barrels per day of pipeline space.

Added together, Enbridge could increase pipeline export capacity in Western Canada by 845,000 barrels per day in the next few years. That amount dwarfs Alberta's rail strategy of adding up to 120,000 barrels per day of export space by train.

"It looks a little bit like an act of desperation by a government trying to be seen to be doing something, and the timing is probably going to be off," said Cooper.

'Not without risk'

One benefit of the government's plan to leaserail cars is that it provides another option to oil producers in the province who can't afford to sign their own long-term contracts with railways to ship oil.

"This is to help ensure smaller producers are not left out of the system over the next few years," said Kevin Birn, a Calgary-basedanalyst with energy research firmIHS Markit.

The crude-by-rail plan follows several other initiatives by Notley and her government to help the beleaguered oilpatch, such as subsidies fornew petrochemical plants, partial upgrading facilities and new refineries, while alsocurtailing oil production,among other measures.

The government's rail carplan is clearly designed to make sure more of Alberta's oil gets to market, but the thousands of tankers may not be needed.

"It's not without risk," said Birn. "We are putting taxpayer dollars on the line here."