Northern Gateway would hurt economy, study says - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 09:48 AM | Calgary | -12.0°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Business

Northern Gateway would hurt economy, study says

A study endorsed by opponents of the Northern Gateway pipeline proposed by Calgary-based Enbridge says it would cause an oil "price shock" to Canada's economy.

Pipeline project would boost price of oil in Canada

Tankers would use Douglas Channel to gain access to the terminus of Enbridge's proposed Northern Gateway oil pipeline at Kitimat, B.C. Opponents fear the pipeline will lead to oil spills. (Darryl Dyck/Canadian Press)

A study endorsed by opponents of theNorthern Gateway pipelineproposed by Calgary-based Enbridge says it would cause an oil "price shock" to Canadas economy.

The economic assessment was done by Robyn Allan, the former CEO of the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia.

It concluded that the higher prices for Canadian oil that would be gained by access to world markets would have an "inflationary price shock which will have a negative and prolonged impact on the Canadian economy by reducing output, employment, labour income and government revenues."

"Higher oil prices mean a decrease in family purchasing power, higher prices for industries who use oil as an input into their production process, higher rates of unemployment in non-oil industry related sectors, a decline in real GDP, a decline in government revenues, an increase in inflation, an increase in interest rates and further appreciation of the Canadian dollar," Allan said.

The studysaid industry predictions of $270 billion in economic benefits from Gateway dont consider the depressing effects of increased oil prices.

The National Energy Board refused to grant Allan status as an intervener in regulatory hearings, the Alberta Federation of Labour said, so it included her report in the AFLs submission.

Argues for more refining in Canada

AFL president Gil McGowan said the study shows that more upgrading and refining of oilsands crude should be done in Canada.

By doing that, he said, "We can make sure that Canadians keep much more of the value created by development within the country. And, by developing markets in Eastern Canada instead of Asia, we can ensure that Alberta's growth isn't coming at the expense of growth in other provinces."

Enbridge spokesman Paul Stanway said the company cant commenton the studybecause it is evidence submitted before regulators, but that the firm will be able to be able to make a rebuttalin September.

Canadas oil industry has maintained that its inability to access world markets has kept Canadian domestic production trapped within North America, creating an oversupply and keeping the price below what it would be otherwise.

However, while Allan's study assumesan annual increase of between$2 and $3 per barrelover 30 years, Stanway saidthat range came from a study commissioned byEnbridge, which dealt only with the one-time, immediateeffect on price, once the pipeline went into operation.

The joint review by the NEB and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency continued Thursday with hearings in Fort St. James, B.C., and is scheduled to last until April, 2013.

The $5.5-billion, 1,177-kilometre project would carry 525,000 barrels of oilsands crude a day from near Edmonton to a tanker terminal at Kitimat, B.C.